Hello, Guest!

Article about do younger women prefer older men:
| The Outline
Despite what men will tell you, the answer is rather complicated. Are men really hard-wired to desire younger women? Despite what men will tell you, the answer is rather complicated.

>>> GO TO SITE <<<


Rebecca Stoner Aug—29—2018 09:23AM EST. Challenging those faux-profound bits of knowledge so often taken for granted. It’s an accepted idea that men are evolutionarily predisposed to want to fuck women at the peak of their fertility — that is, in the first half of their twenties. Women simply can’t help it that, in the words of OkCupid founder Christian Rudder, “From the time you’re twenty-two, you’ll be less hot than a twenty-year-old, based on [OKCupid’s] data. So that’s just a thing. But is it “just a thing?” Should every woman over 22 resign herself to her supposedly natural place on a steep downhill slide? Turns out, it’s complicated. Since it’s an idea that reinforces misogyny in both the romantic and professional lives of women, plenty of people would like to believe it. So it’s worth asking what exactly we actually know about May-December romances, and whether we want to continue to grant this widely-accepted “wisdom” the power it has now. According to U.S. Census data, men are, on average, 1.84 years older than their wives at marriage. Men who remarry are especially likely to seek out younger partners. What we don’t know is whether this pattern of age differences between partners is “natural,” as in evolutionarily determined and largely immutable, or the product of social, cultural, and economic structures — what the legal scholar Catharine MacKinnon called the “eroticization of female subordination.” Scientists have been debating the question for decades, with no conclusive answer yet. Those on Team Evolution point to the prevalence of the pattern as evidence that it’s universal, or nearly so. In a major study of human mating done in 1989, evolutionary psychologist David Buss found that in each of the 37 cultures he surveyed, men preferred to marry younger women, by an average of 2.66 years, and women preferred older men, by an average of 3.42 years. This data, he argues, shows that age preferences for a partner are most likely the product of evolutionary pressures. But because detailed birth, death, and marriage records from the Pleistocene don’t exist, we don’t have direct evidence for any evolutionary advantages tied to age differences. We also don’t know what string of DNA, if one exists, would keep this predisposition alive in humans today — nor how powerful it would be compared to social structural influences. The evolutionary biologist’s perspective is usually more nuanced than a random dude’s assertion that men “just prefer” younger women. Scientists at least acknowledge the fact of female choice. Since women invest heavily in reproduction through pregnancy and nursing, scientists argue, they’re choosy about who they mate with –– and men respond to their preferences. And researchers suggest that the drive to seek younger, peak-fertility women is balanced by an evolutionary drive toward seeking a partner similar in age, which makes co-parenting easier. On the other side of the debate are the social structural theorists, who hypothesize that the difference in preferred age for a partner is the product of societally determined gender roles. In a society based on the model of male breadwinner, female homemaker, women will seek out a man whose economic resources make him a good provider, and men will seek out a woman whose pliability and readiness for reproduction makes her a good housewife. According to this theory, in societies where there’s more gender equality, the age gap between partners will shrink. That’s exactly what the data shows.